Comparing the Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G: Optimal Choices for Budget PC Builders
Summary
- The Intel Core i5-14400 and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G are two top contenders for cost-effective DIY PC builds.
- The i5-14400 excels in single-core performance, while the Ryzen 7 8700G shines in multi-core efficiency.
- Depending on usage, the Ryzen 7 8700G may offer better overall value for productivity tasks.
Hardware Specifications
When selecting a processor for a budget build, both the Intel Core i5-14400 and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G offer compelling features.
-
Intel Core i5-14400:
- Cores/Threads: 10 cores, 16 threads
- Turbo Frequency: Up to 4.7GHz
- Cache: 20MB L3 cache
- TDP: 65W base, 148W max
- Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 730
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G:
- Cores/Threads: 8 cores, 16 threads
- Turbo Frequency: Up to 5.1GHz
- Cache: 16MB L3 cache
- TDP: 65W base, details vary
- Integrated Graphics: AMD Radeon 780M
Performance Benchmarks
CPU-Z Results
In the CPU-Z benchmark, the Intel i5-14400 demonstrated a single-core score of 688.2 and a multi-core score of 6396.6. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 8700G achieved a single-core score of 661.5 and a multi-core score of 6880.9. The i5-14400 slightly outperformed the Ryzen in single-core tasks, while the Ryzen had a notable advantage in multi-core performance.
CINEBENCH R23 Testing
The Core i5-14400 achieved scores of 1810 (single-core) and 14295 (multi-core). In contrast, the Ryzen 7 8700G scored 1825 (single-core) and 17301 (multi-core). This illustrates that although both processors excel in single-task operations, the Ryzen’s multi-core capability is markedly superior.
GeekBench 6 Results
The Core i5-14400 scored 2311 in single-core and 8995 in multi-core tests. The Ryzen 7 8700G achieved 2661 and 10264, respectively. Again, while the Intel chip leads in single-core performance, AMD’s strength shines through in multi-core scenarios.
Memory Latency Comparison
AIDA 64 tests indicated a memory latency of 107.9ns for the i5-14400 compared to 87.3ns for the Ryzen 7 8700G. Lower latency results from the Ryzen series indicate better memory performance, enhancing overall system responsiveness.
Productivity Applications
In practical tasks like photo and video editing, the Core i5-14400 scored 3155 (photo editing) and 3158 (video editing) in UL Procyon tests, whereas the Ryzen 7 8700G outperformed significantly with scores of 4681 and 4180, respectively. Additionally, in WebXPRT 4 tests measuring web application efficiency, the i5-14400 scored 280, while the Ryzen 7 8700G scored 326.
Compression and Encoding Benchmarks
Running the 7-Zip Benchmark revealed Intel’s i5-14400 with a compression speed of 42753KB/s and a decompression speed of 870197KB/s, yielding a total score of 63.118GIPS. Conversely, the Ryzen achieved a faster compression rate of 63412KB/s and decompression of 1204468KB/s, leading to a higher total score of 89.782GIPS.
Video Encoding and Rendering Performance
In encoding tasks, the i5-14400 took 42 seconds to encode 2500 frames at an average frame rate of 58.66fps, while the Ryzen 7 8700G completed the task in just 34 seconds with a faster frame rate of 74.29fps. For rendering tasks, the Intel CPU rendered 4,257,635 rays/second, while the AMD chip outperformed with 5,549,046 rays/second in the Corona 10 Benchmark.
Conclusion
After comprehensive testing, it’s evident that while the Intel Core i5-14400 provides robust performance in single-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms in multi-threaded workloads and productivity applications.
For users focused on video editing or heavy multitasking, the Ryzen 7 8700G is the more cost-effective choice, particularly when considering the minimal price difference. Conversely, for those whose tasks lean more heavily towards single-threaded performance, the i5-14400 remains a solid option.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors should align with the user’s specific needs and workload demands, ensuring maximum efficiency and value in any custom machine build.
